This Special Issue addresses that gap by positioning intellectual capital (IC) as the integrative lens through which the entrepreneurial university can be better understood. In particular, it invites contributions examining how human, structural, and relational capital are created, mobilised, measured, governed, and secured across the entrepreneurial university value chain (de Frutos-Belizón et al., 2019; Kashyap & Agrawal, 2020; Renaud et al., 2019). We are interested in work that connects IC with academic entrepreneurship research and entrepreneurship practice, including opportunity recognition, venture development and scaling, technology transfer office routines, incubator and accelerator support, entrepreneurial pedagogy, and ecosystem orchestration (Aldawod, 2022; Yin et al., 2023; Romano et al., 2025).

We welcome contributions from scholars in intellectual capital, entrepreneurship, innovation management, higher education, public policy, regional development, and related fields. We also particularly encourage submissions that speak to practice and policy, and that show how IC can improve the design, governance, evaluation, and impact of entrepreneurial universities.

We particularly welcome theoretically ambitious and methodologically plural submissions, including comparative, multi-level, longitudinal, mixed-method, network-analytic, text/data-analytic, design-oriented, and field-evaluative studies. Practice-informed submissions are also encouraged, especially where they engage with entrepreneurship educators, TTOs, incubators, ecosystem intermediaries, or policy actors.

List of Topic Areas

Topics may include, but are not limited to:

• Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial mindset development as intellectual capital formation
• Curriculum design, educator roles, and innovative approaches in entrepreneurship education
• Digital and AI-enabled entrepreneurship education as structural capital
• Academic entrepreneurship and the micro-foundations of entrepreneurial intellectual capital
• Technology transfer offices as intellectual capital management mechanisms
• Intellectual capital, spin-offs, and venture creation in university context
• University-industry-society collaboration and IC-mediated innovation performance
• Incubators, accelerators, science parks, and entrepreneurial support infrastructures
• Entrepreneurial ecosystems around universities and ecosystem-level intellectual capital
• Third-mission impact measurement, reporting, and evaluation through IC frameworks
• Practitioner metrics, policy frameworks, and the measurement of knowledge exchange
• Securing intellectual capital in entrepreneurial universities, including IP governance, data governance, cyber risk, and knowledge leakage
• International and comparative studies of entrepreneurial university models
• Multi-level, longitudinal, mixed-method, and engaged research designs in IC and entrepreneurship

Submission Information

Submissions of full manuscripts are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available here:

Submit via ScholarOne

Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Please see:

Author guidelines

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q1, H-Index 124

Key Dates

Opening date for manuscript submissions: 1 June 2026

Closing date for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Intellectual Capital (Intellectual Capital in the Entrepreneurial University: Theory and Practice) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

This Special Issue, “Beyond efficiency in sustainable operations and supply chains: toward regenerative and net-positive systems,” seeks to advance new debates in sustainable operations and supply chains by moving beyond the currently dominant efficiency-based, eco-efficiency, and instrumental approaches to sustainability. While these approaches have generated important improvements, their incremental orientation is increasingly insufficient in the face of climate instability, biodiversity loss, resource depletion, geopolitical turbulence, and widening social inequalities.

The Special Issue provides a platform for research exploring how operations and supply chains can become not only less harmful, but actively restorative, regenerative, and net-positive. It will bring together conceptual, empirical, and pedagogical contributions that examine alternative logics, theories, practices, and system designs capable of supporting long-term ecological and social flourishing.

The originality of the Special Issue lies in explicitly challenging the dominance of efficiency and instrumental logics in sustainable operations and supply chain research. Much of the existing literature continues to emphasise optimisation, compliance, incremental eco-efficiency, and business-case framing. In contrast, this Special Issue foregrounds regenerative and net-positive perspectives, highlighting the need to restore social and ecological systems, rethink value creation, and address sustainability as a systemic and transformative challenge rather than a narrow performance objective.

The Special Issue therefore invites the communities of supply chain management, operations management, and sustainability to engage with regenerative and net-positive perspectives that can extend current debates on responsible production and consumption, circular economy, social responsibility, and contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals. It particularly welcomes interdisciplinary approaches that connect operations and supply chain research with insights from sustainability transitions, industrial ecology, systems thinking, organisational studies, policy, education, and social and environmental sciences.

By advancing research on regenerative manufacturing, operations and supply chains, net-positive organising, circular and restorative value creation, governance, stakeholder collaboration, social justice, inclusion, and teaching innovation, the Special Issue aims to contribute to positive change. It will support theory development, empirical insight, pedagogical innovation, and practical understanding of how organisations and supply chains can move beyond reducing harm toward creating ecological regeneration, social value, and more resilient socio-technical systems.

List of topic areas

• Net-positive organising and system design
• Regenerative manufacturing, operations and supply chains
• Beyond efficiency: critiques of instrumental and business-case sustainability logics
• Resilience, readiness and adaptation in polycrisis conditions
• Circular, restorative and distributive value creation models
• Governance, institutions and stakeholder collaboration for regenerative transitions
• Social justice, inclusion and community outcomes in sustainable supply chains
• Teaching innovation and pedagogical approaches for regenerative OSCM

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available at: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rpc

Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q3, H-Index 4

Key deadlines

Opening date for manuscripts submissions: 01/06/2026
Closing date for manuscripts submission: 30/11/2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

The Special Issue provides a platform for research exploring how operations and supply chains can become not only less harmful, but actively restorative, regenerative, and net-positive. It will bring together conceptual, empirical, and pedagogical contributions that examine alternative logics, theories, practices, and system designs capable of supporting long-term ecological and social flourishing.

The originality of the Special Issue lies in explicitly challenging the dominance of efficiency and instrumental logics in sustainable operations and supply chain research. Much of the existing literature continues to emphasise optimisation, compliance, incremental eco-efficiency, and business-case framing. In contrast, this Special Issue foregrounds regenerative and net-positive perspectives, highlighting the need to restore social and ecological systems, rethink value creation, and address sustainability as a systemic and transformative challenge rather than a narrow performance objective.

The Special Issue therefore invites the communities of supply chain management, operations management, and sustainability to engage with regenerative and net-positive perspectives that can extend current debates on responsible production and consumption, circular economy, social responsibility, and contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals. It particularly welcomes interdisciplinary approaches that connect operations and supply chain research with insights from sustainability transitions, industrial ecology, systems thinking, organisational studies, policy, education, and social and environmental sciences.

By advancing research on regenerative manufacturing, operations and supply chains, net-positive organising, circular and restorative value creation, governance, stakeholder collaboration, social justice, inclusion, and teaching innovation, the Special Issue aims to contribute to positive change. It will support theory development, empirical insight, pedagogical innovation, and practical understanding of how organisations and supply chains can move beyond reducing harm toward creating ecological regeneration, social value, and more resilient socio-technical systems.

List of topic areas

• Net-positive organising and system design
• Regenerative manufacturing, operations and supply chains
• Beyond efficiency: critiques of instrumental and business-case sustainability logics
• Resilience, readiness and adaptation in polycrisis conditions
• Circular, restorative and distributive value creation models
• Governance, institutions and stakeholder collaboration for regenerative transitions
• Social justice, inclusion and community outcomes in sustainable supply chains
• Teaching innovation and pedagogical approaches for regenerative OSCM

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available at: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rpc

Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q3, H-Index 4

Key deadlines

Opening date for manuscripts submissions: 01/06/2026
Closing date for manuscripts submission: 30/11/2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption (Beyond efficiency in sustainable operations and supply chains: toward regenerative and net-positive systems ) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) occupies a central and yet underexplored position within this transformation. Historically, PLM systems have served as the digital backbone of manufacturing organisations — enabling product data management, cross-functional integration, and process coordination from concept development through to end-of-life. This role has been indispensable in supporting the efficiency and traceability demands of modern industrial operations. However, the principles of Industry 5.0 expose significant limitations in this traditional conception of PLM. Systems designed primarily for data integration and process efficiency are not inherently equipped to support human operator well-being, embed circular economy strategies, ensure lifecycle traceability under evolving regulatory frameworks, or enable rapid organisational adaptation in the face of disruption.

This Special Issue responds directly to this gap. It introduces and advances the concept of PLM 5.0, a socio-technical and managerial evolution of traditional PLM systems that repositions PLM not as an IT infrastructure, but as a strategic governance platform capable of orchestrating lifecycle data, human interaction, sustainability metrics, and adaptive decision-making across complex and distributed industrial ecosystems.

The Special Issue is driven by four core research questions:

• How should PLM systems be redesigned to support human operator development, decision-making, and ergonomic well-being?
• What organizational and managerial changes are required to integrate circular economy principles throughout the product lifecycle?
• How can PLM systems enable manufacturing resilience and rapid adaptation to disruptions
• What governance, interoperability, and data management frameworks are needed to support these PLM transformations in diverse industrial contexts?

The aims of the Special Issue are therefore:

1. To conceptualize “PLM 5.0” as a socio-technical and managerial evolution of traditional PLM systems.
2. To provide empirical and theoretical contributions that integrate the three Industry 5.0 pillars within lifecycle-wide management systems.
3. To explore organizational, governance, and capability-related implications of PLM transformation.
4. To deliver actionable frameworks and strategic guidance for both SMEs and large enterprises.

The papers gathered here span conceptual, empirical, methodological, and case-based contributions, drawing on an established international community of scholars in PLM, manufacturing management, circular economy, and industrial sustainability. Together, they advance both theoretical understanding of PLM’s evolving role and practical guidance for firms navigating the transition toward more responsible and adaptive modes of lifecycle management.

List of Topic Areas

1. Redesigning PLM Systems for Industry 5.0
2. Human-Centric PLM and Operator Development
3. Circular Economy Integration within PLM
4. Sustainable Lifecycle Assessment and Net-Zero Strategies
5. Resilient Manufacturing and Adaptive Lifecycle Management
6. Governance, Interoperability, and Data Management Frameworks
7. Decision-Support and Managerial Transformation
8. Sector-Specific Applications with Cross-Industry Implications.

Guest Editors

Romeo Bandinelli, University of Florence, Italy, romeo.bandinelli@unifi.it

Monica Rossi, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, monica.rossi@polimi.it

Claudio Sassanelli, Politecnico di Bari, Italy, claudio.sassanelli@poliba.it

Virginia Fani, Universitas Mercatorum, Italy, virginia.fani@unimercatorum.it

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Author guidelines must be strictly followed.

Submit via ScholarOne

Author Guidelines

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”. Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q1, H-Index 108

Key Deadlines

Opening date for manuscripts submissions: 6th May 2026

Closing date for manuscripts submission: 31st July 2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management (Industry 5.0-driven Product Lifecycle Management: toward human-centric, sustainable, and resilient manufacturing) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

These developments have generated new financing channels and new actors within entrepreneurial ecosystems, while simultaneously raising fundamental questions about who gains access to capital, under what conditions, and through which mechanisms (Bertello et al., 2022). This evolving environment is particularly challenging for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and new ventures, which typically lack the collateral, legitimacy, and institutional visibility enjoyed by larger firms (Cowling et al., 2021).

The financial landscape in which entrepreneurs operate today is far more complex than the contexts in which traditional financial theories were originally developed. Emerging financing channels – ranging from crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending to tokenized assets and AI-driven credit platforms – have transformed how capital is allocated (Battisti et al., 2024; Block et al., 2018; Butticè & Vismara, 2022). Yet financial decisions are not purely technical or autonomous; they are shaped by behavioral biases, social networks, institutional environments, accounting practices, and sustainability logics (Colombo et al., 2023). While these dimensions have been examined separately across disciplines, systematic dialogue focused on entrepreneurship and small business finance remains limited (Bertoni et al., 2022; Inceoglu et al., 2024).

The rise of artificial intelligence makes this interdisciplinary engagement particularly urgent. AI does not merely represent a new analytical tool; it acts as a structural force reshaping relationships among entrepreneurs, investors, platforms, and institutions (Tran and Murphy, 2023; Kleinert & Vismara, 2026). It transforms credit evaluation, risk modeling, and investment screening, directly affecting SMEs’ access to finance (Li et al., 2024).

Simultaneously, AI reshapes how ventures are created, scaled, and governed, with implications for financial structures, resource mobilization, and legitimacy (Obschonka et al., 2025). In doing so, it cuts across behavioral, social, accounting, and sustainability dimensions of entrepreneurial finance, underscoring why an interdisciplinary approach is not only desirable but essential.
This Special Issue seeks to advance a multidisciplinary research agenda on the evolving relationship between entrepreneurship and finance. We invite contributions that deepen theoretical and empirical understanding of how digitalization, AI, and sustainability pressures are reshaping entrepreneurial finance. The goal is to provide insights relevant not only to scholars in management and finance but also to entrepreneurs, SME managers, investors, policymakers, and financial intermediaries navigating increasingly complex ecosystems.

We welcome conceptual articles, systematic literature reviews, bibliometric analyses, and empirical contributions employing quantitative, qualitative, experimental, or mixed methods. Longitudinal studies, cross-national comparisons, and multi-level designs are particularly encouraged. All submissions should meaningfully engage both the entrepreneurial and financial dimensions of the phenomenon and discuss implications for theory, practice, and policy.

List of Topic Areas

The Guest Editors invite conceptual, methodological, and empirical contributions that address themes such as – but not limited to – the following:

• Environmental and Social Disclosure in SMEs: Implications for Access to Capital, Investor Relations, and Financial Performance.
• Access to Capital and Financing Decisions in SMEs: Behavioral, Cognitive, and Psychological Determinants.
• Entrepreneurial Finance and Social Inclusion: Gender, Ethnicity, and Geography as Structural Barriers to Capital Access.
• Financial Reporting, Intangible Assets, and Creditworthiness in Innovative Small Businesses.
  Regulatory Frameworks and Institutional Conditions for Entrepreneurial Finance Across National Contexts.
• Alternative Financing Mechanisms: Crowdfunding, Peer-to-Peer Lending, and Tokenized Assets: Financial Performance and Social Implications.
• AI-Driven Financial Decision-Making: Credit Scoring, Risk Modeling, and Investment Screening for Small Businesses.
• The Financial Implications of AI-Powered Venture Creation: Resource Mobilization, Capital Structure, and Legitimacy in Platform-Based Startups.

Submission Information

Submissions of full manuscripts are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available here:

Submit via ScholarOne

Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Please see:

Author guidelines

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q1, H-Index 97

Key Dates

Opening date for manuscript submissions: 4 January 2027

Closing date for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2027

Guest Editors

Enrico Battisti, University of Turin, Turin, Italy, enrico.battisti@unito.it (lead guest editor)

Francesco Schiavone, University Parthenope, Naples, Italy, francesco.schiavone@uniparthenope.it

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development (Rethinking Entrepreneurial Finance: Multidisciplinary Perspectives in a Transforming Financial Landscape ) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

List of Topic Areas

• Arts
• Mental health
• Public health
• Film
• Campaigns
• Recovery

Submission Information

Submissions of full manuscripts are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available here:

Submit via ScholarOne

Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Please see:

Author guidelines

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q3, H-index 32

Key Dates

Closing date for manuscript submissions: 28 August 2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Public Mental Health (The role of the arts in mental health promotion, prevention and recovery​) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

Call for Papers
Themed Issue of Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal (SEAMJ)
‘Future Sustainability of Borneo’

The Themed Issue aims to shed light on the future of Borneo, focussing on sustainability interests. The development of Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN), Indonesia’s new capital in Kalimantan, has raised concerns from various groups regarding potential impacts on the rainforest and vulnerable endemic species, given the size of Indonesia’s economy. However, to others, this offers an opportunity for growth and sustainable development of this largely neglected region of east ASEAN, or BIMP-EAGA, which comprises Brunei, the Bornean parts of Indonesia and Malaysia, and southern Philippines. Meanwhile, climate change is threatening the major cities of Borneo, most of which are found along the coast.

Borneo is widely known for its rainforest and diverse indigenous groups, which are threaten by modern development. However, few outside Borneo really knows the situation on the ground or the aspiration, culture and indigenous wisdom of its people. This special issue aims to shed light on realities through work done by academics working in Borneo, particularly natives of the land, regarding sustainability concerns, climate change, increasing digitalisation, globalisation and the development of IKN.

Key Themes Include:

• Sustainability considerations associated with IKN.
• Climate change adaptation, specifically sea level rise.
• Digitalisation.
• Ecological designs and sustainability.
• The future of traditional knowledge/culture, and society.

Guest Editors:

• Rosnah Abdullah
  Head, Borneo Studies Network Secretariat, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei.
• Zairin Zain,
  Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
• Poline Bala
  University Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q2, H-Index 7

Important Dates:

• Submission Deadline of Full Paper: 28 February 2026
• Expected Publication Date: End of 2026

For enquiries, please contact Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Ahsan Ullah at ahsan.ullah@ubd.edu.bn.

All submissions and peer review must be done via the journal’s ScholarOne submission and peer review system. Please select the issue ‘Future Sustainability of Borneo‘ when preparing your submission in the system.

 Submit Your Paper 

Author Guidelines must be strictly followed.

Author Guidelines

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

Executives play a pivotal role in shaping how organizations plan, budget, forecast, and evaluate performance. Their decisions are not only technical or strategic but also profoundly influenced by personal dispositions and psychological traits. While upper echelons research has demonstrated that executives’ characteristics affect organizational outcomes, management accounting research has only begun to explore this link.

Recent corporate crises illustrate how executive hubris, narcissism, or overconfidence can distort reporting practices and undermine effective resource allocation. At the same time, traits such as conscientiousness, honesty–humility, and openness to experience can strengthen coordination, transparency, and long-term success. Understanding how these bright and dark traits interact with management accounting and control systems (MACS) is essential for explaining organizational behavior and performance.

This special issue seeks to advance understanding of how executive personality interacts with MACS to shape organizational behavior and outcomes. The studies examine how traits such as the dark and bright triads, the Big Five, and honesty–humility manifest in budgeting, forecasting, cost behavior, and performance measurement. They also investigate when and how MACS and incentive systems mitigate or amplify the effects of executive traits on resource allocation, truthful reporting, and sustainable performance.

Together, the contributions build a stronger theoretical and empirical foundation for the personality–MACS nexus. They reveal mechanisms through which executive traits shape accounting practice, identify the conditions under which MACS mitigate unintended consequences or leverage beneficial effects, and offer insights that inform the design of accounting systems responsive to human behavior.

List of Topic Areas

• MACS design and use: How do executive traits influence the adoption of MACS, such as budgeting, cost accounting, or interactive control systems? Under what conditions do these systems enhance creativity and coordination or suppress opportunism and slack?
• Dark and bright triads: When do dark triad traits lead to biases in budgeting, subjective judgments, or earnings manipulation? Which MACS elements (e.g., transparency or peer review) help reduce these effects? Conversely, when do bright triad traits foster prosocial behavior, such as honesty and fairness, and can they also have unintended adverse consequences for MACS?
• Incentive systems: How do executive pay structures interact with personality traits to influence managerial behavior? When can compensation plans discipline undesired traits, and when might they increase them?
• Firm performance and societal outcomes: How do executive traits and MACS together impact investment efficiency, risk-taking, tax strategies, and ESG results?
• New traits and new contexts: Which hitherto overlooked traits (e.g., locus of control, moral character, or tolerance for ambiguity) are relevant for management accounting? How do contingencies (like family firms, SMEs, or mission-driven organizations) affect the relationship between executive personality and MACS?

Guest Editors

Philipp Richter, Dresden University of Technology, Germany, philipp_clemens.richter@tu-dresden.de

Aline Grahn, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, aline.grahn@fu-berlin.de

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Author guidelines must be strictly followed.

Submit via ScholarOne

Author Guidelines

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q1, H-index 43

Key Deadlines

Opening date for manuscripts submissions: 15th March 2026

Closing date for manuscripts submission: 16th August 2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal Call for paper: Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

Recent corporate crises illustrate how executive hubris, narcissism, or overconfidence can distort reporting practices and undermine effective resource allocation. At the same time, traits such as conscientiousness, honesty–humility, and openness to experience can strengthen coordination, transparency, and long-term success. Understanding how these bright and dark traits interact with management accounting and control systems (MACS) is essential for explaining organizational behavior and performance.

This special issue seeks to advance understanding of how executive personality interacts with MACS to shape organizational behavior and outcomes. The studies examine how traits such as the dark and bright triads, the Big Five, and honesty–humility manifest in budgeting, forecasting, cost behavior, and performance measurement. They also investigate when and how MACS and incentive systems mitigate or amplify the effects of executive traits on resource allocation, truthful reporting, and sustainable performance.

Together, the contributions build a stronger theoretical and empirical foundation for the personality–MACS nexus. They reveal mechanisms through which executive traits shape accounting practice, identify the conditions under which MACS mitigate unintended consequences or leverage beneficial effects, and offer insights that inform the design of accounting systems responsive to human behavior.

List of Topic Areas

• MACS design and use: How do executive traits influence the adoption of MACS, such as budgeting, cost accounting, or interactive control systems? Under what conditions do these systems enhance creativity and coordination or suppress opportunism and slack?
• Dark and bright triads: When do dark triad traits lead to biases in budgeting, subjective judgments, or earnings manipulation? Which MACS elements (e.g., transparency or peer review) help reduce these effects? Conversely, when do bright triad traits foster prosocial behavior, such as honesty and fairness, and can they also have unintended adverse consequences for MACS?
• Incentive systems: How do executive pay structures interact with personality traits to influence managerial behavior? When can compensation plans discipline undesired traits, and when might they increase them?
• Firm performance and societal outcomes: How do executive traits and MACS together impact investment efficiency, risk-taking, tax strategies, and ESG results?
• New traits and new contexts: Which hitherto overlooked traits (e.g., locus of control, moral character, or tolerance for ambiguity) are relevant for management accounting? How do contingencies (like family firms, SMEs, or mission-driven organizations) affect the relationship between executive personality and MACS?

Guest Editors

Philipp Richter, Dresden University of Technology, Germany, philipp_clemens.richter@tu-dresden.de

Aline Grahn, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, aline.grahn@fu-berlin.de

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Author guidelines must be strictly followed.

Submit via ScholarOne

Author Guidelines

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q1, H-Index 43

Key Deadlines

Opening date for manuscripts submissions: 15th March 2026

Closing date for manuscripts submission: 16th August 2026

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal Call for paper: Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change (Bright Minds, Dark Shadows: Executive Personality and the Role of Management Accounting) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.

Yet, adoption remains uneven. For instance, European countries average a 54 percent adoption rate, below the global average of 61 percent (Kirvelä, Axelsson & Mäkelä, 2025). This uneven adoption is compounded by the global competition for skilled talent and persistent workforce shortages, particularly in digital and AI-related fields (Green, 2024; OECD, 2024, Rigley, Bentley, Krook, & Ramchurn, 2024). McKinsey (2023) estimates that up to 12 million job transitions may be required due to AI, underscoring the urgent need for reskilling and entrepreneurial innovation.

This Special Issue (SI) call aims to advance empirical understanding of how, when, and why humans engage with Gen AI in innovation. We focus on Gen AI as an innovation enabler, and invite submissions to explore the themes, including but not limited to innovation processes, human capital resources, and organizational capabilities. We welcome single- and multi-level studies that examine Gen AI’s role in shaping innovation within and across organizations and encourage contributions that take an interdisciplinary perspective. More importantly, submissions should address managers’ pressing challenges in finding new ways to support and improve innovation by investigating how managers can effectively enhance how employees and executives use Gen AI.

List of Topic Areas

Theme 1: Gen AI and Innovation Processes

​Technological advancements have made Gen AI more accessible and affordable across industries (Bouschery et al., 2023; Gama & Magistretti, 2023). Gen AI’s impacts are not limited to what organizations innovate but it also changes how they innovate (Mariani & Dwidedi, 2024). Gen AI can be used to replace existing innovation processes, reinforce them, or reveal unforeseen ways of developing new products and services (Gama & Magistretti, 2023). It may, for example, assist in the identification of opportunities, idea generation, and evaluation of innovation potential, reshaping the front-end of innovation processes (Pescher & Tellis, 2025), and enable more rapid experimentation and improved customer understanding (Füller et al., 2022; Roberts & Candi, 2024). Yet, experiences and use cases remain evolving and fragmented, creating uncertainty for managers. As Roberts and Candi (2024) note, “the possibility of using Gen AI in the innovation process is something that firms may not have explored yet.”

​Furthermore, Gen AI transforms innovation processes at multiple interrelated levels, whereas existing research has mostly examined them in isolation (Roberts & Candi, 2024; Brem et al., 2023; Füller et al., 2022). Consequently, this Special Issue encourages a multi-level perspective, including individual, team, and organizational level processes. To advance this theme, potential authors are invited to make empirical submissions that explore questions such as:

• ​How is Gen AI being used in innovation processes at different levels?
• How do organizations apply Gen AI to replace, reinforce, or reveal innovation activities, and what are the resulting effects on, for example, process efficiency, novelty, and responsiveness to market needs?
• How do varied patterns of Gen AI use across process phases and organizational levels influence the dynamics and management of innovation processes?

​Theme 2: Gen AI and Human Capabilities

Microfoundations research shows that innovation is fundamentally driven by people, not organizations, since it is individuals who identify opportunities, generate solutions, and implement them (Felin et al., 2015). Equally, to understand how Gen AI enhances innovation outcomes, such as faster development of better-quality products, services, and processes, it is necessary to examine how individual innovators use Gen AI, what influences its use, and what results emerge from these AI-augmented efforts (Amankwah-Amoah & Appiah, 2025; Annosi et al., 2024; Weiss et al., 2022). Team-level dynamics are equally important, as teams have become the core unit of modern organizations. Virtual teams, in particular, require attention to build resilience and achieve innovative outcomes (Degbey & Einola, 2020). Gen AI can support team innovation by sparking dynamic discussions and promoting diverse thinking in design processes (Bouschery et al., 2023), ethical decision-making in human resource management processes (Rodgers, Murray, Stefanidis, Degbey, & Tarba, 2023), and by helping overcome challenges in group decision-making (Metcalf et al., 2019). Finally, scholars have called for more research on how leadership can support AI adoption and digital transformation (Gilli, Lettner & Guettel, 2024; Tursunbayeva & Chalutz-Ben Gal, 2024). Leaders must build new capabilities as AI implementation is often challenging, human-AI interaction may involve complications, and a new range of ethical concerns must be considered (Aziz et al., 2025).

​To advance this theme, potential authors are invited to make empirical submissions that explore questions such as:

• ​How do individual innovators use Gen AI in their work, what influences this usage, and what are the measurable outcomes of AI-augmented innovation efforts in terms of product, service, or process quality and speed?
• In what ways does Gen AI influence innovation team dynamics, including collaboration, resilience, and decision-making, particularly in virtual or hybrid team environments?
• ​What psychological and behavioral effects emerge from using Gen AI in innovation settings, such as changes in employee engagement, collaboration dynamics, or perceptions of autonomy?
• How do managerial competencies influence the successful implementation of Gen AI in organizational innovation efforts?

​Theme 3: Gen AI and Organizational Capabilities

​The rapid evolution of Gen AI demands not only technical adaptation but also new approaches to manage the associated processes, tensions, and frustrations. As Gen AI profoundly alters work design, skill requirements, and professional identities, employees face both new opportunities and psychological challenges. To ensure they can develop the AI-related skills needed for the evolving roles, organizational and managerial support mechanisms have to be developed. Yet, there is limited understanding of the organizational capabilities required to implement this change successfully. Effective support may involve building Gen AI literacy, fostering experimentation, and promoting continuous learning (Sabbah & Li, 2025; Füller et al., 2022). At its best, AI is strategically deployed to generate business value and competitive advantage, but without targeted support, organizations risk de-skilling, employee resistance, and ineffective adoption that undermines innovation goals.

Organizational practices for managing innovation are also being challenged by Gen AI, especially in terms of ethical governance. While the benefits of Gen AI in innovation are promising, ethical concerns remain underexplored (Asante et al., 2025; Mäntymäki et al., 2022). Key principles include respect for intellectual property, truthfulness, robustness, recognition of malicious uses, sociocultural responsibility, and human-centric design (Laine et al., 2025).

​To advance this theme, potential authors are invited to make empirical submissions that explore questions such as:

• ​What organizational capabilities need to be developed to successfully implement, integrate, and support the use of Gen AI in innovation efforts?
• How are organizations supporting continuous learning and skill development for employees working with Gen AI, and what mechanisms are most effective in enabling the strategic use of Gen AI?
• What ethical challenges do organizations face when deploying Gen AI in innovation activities, and how are they addressing issues such as intellectual property, transparency, and sociocultural responsibility?

​Overall, we seek papers that provide empirical contributions on the evolving role of Gen AI in innovation to deepen psychological and social insights into management practices to support, improve, and offer practical guidance to help managers navigate Gen AI adoption and integration. Submissions that pertain to the three identified themes are welcome for this Special Issue. The listed themes are neither exhaustive nor exclusive; we encourage authors to explore other themes aligned with the aims of the Special Issue and JMP. Further, we seek to bring together scholars of innovation, organizational behavior, management, HR, strategy, technology, and practitioners to contribute research that aligns with JMP’s scope.​

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available here.

Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Please see here.​

Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to “Please select the issue you are submitting to”.

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Key Deadlines

Opening date for manuscripts submissions: ​15/01/2026​

Closing date for manuscripts submission: ​31/08/2026

Journal Information: Scopus Journal Q1, H-Index 110

Guest Editors

​​William Y. Degbey, University of Vaasa, Finland, william.degbey@uwasa.fi​

​​Maria Pajuoja, University of Vaasa, Finland; Esade, Spain, maria.pajuoja@esade.edu; maria.pajuoja@uwasa.fi​

Matti Pihlajamaa, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland, matti.pihlajamaa@vtt.fi

Baniyelme D. Zoogah, McMaster University, Canada, zoogahb@mcmaster.ca

​​Waymond Rodgers, University of Texas, USA, wrodgers@utep.edu​

For more details refer here

brochure

The post Scopus Journal call for paper: Journal of Managerial Psychology (Beyond the Code: Understanding How, When and Why Humans Employ Generative AI in Innovation ) appeared first on KnowledgeSteez.