Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Where gender affects the evaluation of scholarly work, this can shape outcomes in areas such as peer review; grant funding; career progression; and research trends. Understanding under which conditions gender has an influence on evaluations has broader implications for equity within academic environments. This Collection invites research on these dynamics, focusing on the impact of gender on the overall landscape of research, including the experiences of cisgender, transgender, non-binary, and genderqueer individuals.
Research on gender equity has the potential to inform systemic changes within academic institutions. Better understanding of research conditions; research output; and research evaluation may help identifying effective strategies to promote equitable practices in academia and among other stakeholders in research.
Topics of interest for this Collection include, but are not limited to:
The role of gender in academic careers
The impact of author gender on perceptions of research quality
Peer review dynamics and the influence of reviewer and author gender
Metascientific, cross-disciplinary perspectives
The Collection aims to promote work that will contribute to equitable research environments for cisgender, transgender, non-binary and genderqueer individuals.
The share of women recipients of professional awards in Social and Personality Psychology has increased between 1968 and 2021. Yet, this increase is partially explained by women receiving proportionally more service and teaching awards, whereas research awards are given to men.
In an analysis of 130,000+ abstracts, promotional language predicted more citations, views, and higher Altmetric scores, benefiting male authors more than female authors and reinforcing the gender gap in science.
The study shows a significant gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on Twitter, finding that women are about 28% less likely to promote their own academic papers compared to men, a disparity which is even more pronounced among highly productive women at prestigious institutions. Women’s self-promotion efforts tend to yield fewer overall mentions and visibility online compared to men, highlighting systematic gender biases in digital scholarly communication.
Academic freedom is increasingly threatened by homophobic legislation. Stella Nyanzi describes how this affects queer African scholars, and calls for resistance.
Algorithmic gender and race/ethnicity inference tools based on author names have very high error rates in marginalized communities. This may result in misleading results in many computational social science and sociology projects.