Call for Contributions | Völkerrechtsblog: GenAI and the Future of (International) Legal Scholarship, Submit Now
Generative AI is rapidly reshaping how legal scholarship is researched, written, reviewed, and taught. What does this mean for scholarship itself?
To accompany Jean d’Aspremont’s contribution “Against the Suspicion of Machines – Why Academia Should Stop the Witch Hunt”, Völkerrechtsblog invites short contributions on the changing conditions of legal and academic knowledge production.
Topics include:
• Writing with AI versus thinking with AI
• Authorship, originality, and academic integrity
• AI scrutiny as a potential practice of cancelling and censorship
• Reading, writing, teaching, and scholarly exchange in the age of generative AI
• Implications for peer review and academic publishing
• The political economy of AI, including technological power, bias, unequal access, labour, and environmental costs
Contributions may engage with, complement, or challenge d’Aspremont’s argument, approach these questions from different disciplinary, theoretical, or geographical perspectives, or reflect on personal experiences with AI in scholarship.
The aim is to open a broad and inclusive conversation about what kinds of scholarship and academic institutions we want in an age of AI.
📩 Submit contributions: editors-in-chief@voelkerrechtsblog.org | Subject: “GenAI and Scholarship”
For more details, refer here
